Subscribe
2009 NBA All Star Slam Dunk Contest in Phoenix Player First Round Final Round Nate Robinson [WINNER] (New York) 87 52% Dwight Howard (Orlando) 100 48% JR Smith (Denver) 85 / Rudy Fernandez (Portland) 84 /
2009 NBA All Star Slam Dunk Contest in Phoenix Player First Round Final Round Nate Robinson [WINNER] (New York) 87 52% Dwight Howard (Orlando) 100 48% JR Smith (Denver) 85 / Rudy Fernandez (Portland) 84 /
212vica
/ January 17, 2013well he certinaly not 5′6 if height is underestimated then spud was dunking at 5′4 or 5′3
ImBigAndProud
/ January 18, 2013no he’s not, the nba says he is 5′9, but he is shorter than that, nba usually always gets there measurement wrong
212vica
/ January 18, 20135′9
kareem dixon
/ January 18, 2013man dwight howard ALWAYS GO BEAST !!!!!
izyman5
/ January 18, 2013Nice quality
ImBigAndProud
/ January 18, 2013he about 5′6 5′7
tonymlg91
/ January 18, 2013you’re*
Derek70388
/ January 18, 2013He measured 5′7 3/4″ at pre-draft.
legomaker8
/ January 18, 2013Dwight’s was overrated
MikeCudi97
/ January 18, 2013nate aint 5′2 he’s 5′9 come on
TheCulturalBlends
/ January 18, 2013notice how Tom Chambers and Dan Majerle scored Rudy’s first dunk a 9, and the other judges an 8…..thats not coincidence.
vince palma
/ January 18, 20131:40 is funny
hahahaha
bruiserboy122
/ January 18, 2013dwight howard was in 2008 and 2009 dunk contest. and he was awesome in all of them
DeadxThrone1
/ January 18, 2013It’s not really spoiled if this was in 2009, retard.
Jake Alby
/ January 18, 2013dwights shoulda been a 45
Bob Donavan
/ January 18, 2013you spoiled it in the description
Geranimofool
/ January 18, 2013i dont even see it lol
IBdaPrince
/ January 18, 2013that goes and proves my point though. u just mentioned one good dunk in two different dunk contests. ONE! It’s about dunks, not just how tall or short a person is. His dunks lacked creativity or degree of difficulty. Yeah it’s cool he can jump over people, but that doesn’t make up for the fact that all his other dunks were very basic and it doesn’t make up for him takin forever to make most of his basic dunks. He won because he’s short, not because his dunks were all that great
ImBigAndProud
/ January 18, 2013he beat dwight cuz hee had better dunks, dunking over a 6′11 dude is amazing, against iggy he dunked over spud, which isnt as hard as dwight or nearly as hard i should say but still hard, u can go either way wit who won that one i have no prob wit iggy winning it he did good, and the third won it wasnt his fault every1 else sucked, so he didnt really have to do anything to crazy
IBdaPrince
/ January 18, 2013he really does. Nate is a good dunker, but most of his dunks were basic. Dwight put some creativity in his dunks. He won over Andre Iguodala cuz he was short, he beat Dwight cuz he was short, and he won the third one cuz everyone else was pretty bad
ImBigAndProud
/ January 18, 20131.its not his fault 2. no he doesnt
STEVECOTEZ
/ January 18, 2013ok i know micheal jordan but be honest did take mj 10+ TIMES TO THROW DOWN A SIMPLE WINDMIL!!!!!!!!!
vlatkori
/ January 18, 2013Rudy Fernandez should have at least been in the finals
moviecritic6
/ January 18, 2013Oh god I’m scurred
GotKn1fe
/ January 18, 2013That;s right BOY S-H-U-T U-P